Where controversial subjects are heard, meet their doom or rise to fame. Offering free web coverage, and alternative subsections. You can call me 8325107597 text 25697 me email me , email@example.com,
The world's first geneticallymodified humans have been created, it was revealed last night.
The disclosure that 30 healthy babies were born after a series of experiments in the United States provoked another furious debate about ethics.
So far, two of the babies have been tested and have been found to contain genes from three 'parents'.
Fifteen of the children were born in the past three years as a result of one experimental programme at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey.
The babies were born to women who had problems conceiving. Extra genes from a female donor were inserted into their eggs before they were fertilised in an attempt to enable them to conceive.
Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year- old children confirm that they have inherited DNA from three adults --two women and one man.
The fact that the children have inherited the extra genes and incorporated them into their 'germline' means that they will, in turn, be able to pass them on to their own offspring.
Altering the human germline - in effect tinkering with the very make-up of our species - is a technique shunned by the vast majority of the world's scientists.
Geneticists fear that one day this method could be used to create new races of humans with extra, desired characteristics such as strength or high intelligence.
Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers, led by fertility pioneer Professor Jacques Cohen, say that this 'is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children'.
Some experts severely criticised the experiments. Lord Winston, of the Hammersmith Hospital in West London, told the BBC yesterday: 'Regarding the treat-ment of the infertile, there is no evidence that this technique is worth doing . . . I am very surprised that it was even carried out at this stage. It would certainly not be allowed in Britain.'
John Smeaton, national director of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said: 'One has tremendous sympathy for couples who suffer infertility problems. But this seems to be a further illustration of the fact that the whole process of in vitro fertilisation as a means of conceiving babies leads to babies being regarded as objects on a production line.
'It is a further and very worrying step down the wrong road for humanity.' Professor Cohen and his colleagues diagnosed that the women were infertile because they had defects in tiny structures in their egg cells, called mitochondria.
They took eggs from donors and, using a fine needle, sucked some of the internal material - containing 'healthy' mitochondria - and injected it into eggs from the women wanting to conceive.
Because mitochondria contain genes, the babies resulting from the treatment have inherited DNA from both women. These genes can now be passed down the germline along the maternal line.
A spokesman for the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), which regulates 'assisted reproduction' technology in Britain, said that it would not license the technique here because it involved altering the germline.
Jacques Cohen is regarded as a brilliant but controversial scientist who has pushed the boundaries of assisted reproduction technologies.
He developed a technique which allows infertile men to have their own children, by injecting sperm DNA straight into the egg in the lab.
Prior to this, only infertile women were able to conceive using IVF. Last year, Professor Cohen said that his expertise would allow him to clone children --a prospect treated with horror by the mainstream scientific community.
'It would be an afternoon's work for one of my students,' he said, adding that he had been approached by 'at least three' individuals wishing to create a cloned child, but had turned down their requests.
You lied when you told me that you loved me, You lied when you told me you were true, The truth is you don't really know what love is, or how powerful love is/has a hold on you,
Many men walk down this lonesome road, Thinking about you and the love you sold, You said you would give right down to everything you had, But love wasn't good enough so they stripped you down to your shirt off your back, Your just too naive to think that I would believe in such a thing, You told me you loved me enough and if I would wear your ring, You said you believed in something and it was better than nothing at all, And I slowly fell behind the facade, Waking up in the mourning I realized there is no such thing, it's not a story, it's just a dream, but it broke me away from my repetitiveness,
LOVE HAS NO ADDICTION EITHER YOU WANT IT OR YOU DON'T. LOVE HAS NO ADDICTION EITHER YOU WANT HIM OR YOU DON'T.
KEEP PRAYING FOR ONE THOUSAND YEARS OF PEACE,
Horrible tradgedy, LAS VEGAS. its hard to keep my mind on everyhing that the world is going thru. The end is near, or is it just a simple faze that we are going thru? Does this motto ever come to mind? "You asked for it. you got it, TOYOTA". and all the while we cannot absorb all the events that happened in just one day, let alone one year,decades go by and we are the ones who gets PTSD, often asking and praying to a God in fear, that he isn't there? Scary thought isnt it? I guess all we can ever really ask for from anyone in a time like this is for you to feel for them, live this tradgedy , don't let them go it alone. and for those of you have liives the tradgedy, acknowledge the Angels standing by your side. who desperately, really wants to help you make it thru this. AMEN? amen.
As the end of all creation and eternity approaches you ask yourself how could I have missed it? How come I couldn't see? There is no love …