Marriage is a funny thing

When two people get married everything from that day forth becomes mutual property of both spouses .but whatever pre existed remains individual personal property.
This is how money the most liquidate resource is transferred.
If they married more than once it becomes simular to a love triangle, and is recognizable in all courts since divorce became acceptable and lawful.
Reference ; Open main menu
This in fact created a big agenda for foul play, malice, racketeering .
The same principle should apply when this happens as the" merger", between two companies.

EditWatch this page

Love triangle

Not to be confused with Triangular theory of love or Ménage à trois.

For other uses, see Love triangle (disambiguation).

love triangle (also called a romantic love triangle or a romance triangle) is usually a romantic relationshipinvolving three people. While it can refer to two people independently romantically linked with a third, it usually implies that each of the three people has some kind of relationship to the other two. The relationships can be friendships, romantic, or familial.

"Although the romantic love triangle is formally identical to the friendship triad, as many have noted their actual implications are quite
different....Romantic love is typically viewed as an exclusive relationship, whereas friendship is not."[1] Statistics suggest that, in Western society, "wittingly or not, most adults have been involved in a love triangle".[2]

Two main forms of love triangle have been distinguished: "there is the rivalrous triangle, where the lover is competing with a rival for the love of the beloved, and the split-object triangle, where a lover has split their attention between two love objects".[3]

Contents

History and definitionsCommon themesEternal triangleHomosocialityMarital breakupIn entertainmentFictionTelevisionMusicBloomsburyRelated termsMénage à troisLove rectangleSee alsoReferencesExternal links

History and definitionsEdit

"Gianciotto Discovers Paolo andFrancesca" by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres ; it depicts the Divine Comedy.

The term "love triangle" generally connotes an arrangement unsuitable to one or more of the people involved. One person typically ends up feeling betrayed at some point, e.g. 'Person A is jealous of person C who is having a relationship with person B who, in person A's eyes, is "his" person'.[4] A similar arrangement that is agreed upon by all parties is sometimes called a triad, a type of polyamory, although polyamory usually implies sexual relations. Within the context of monogamy, love triangles are inherently unstable, with unrequited love and jealousy as common themes. Though rare, love triangles have been known to lead to murder or suicide committed by the actual or perceived rejected lover.

Psychoanalysis has explored 'the theme of erotic love triangles and their roots in the Oedipal triangle'.[5] Experience suggests that 'a repeated pattern of forming or being caught in love triangle can be much dissolved by beginning to analyse the patterns of the childhood relationship to each parent in turn and to both parents as a couple'.[6] In such instances, 'you find men who are attracted only by married woman but who can't sustain the relationship if it threatens to become more than an affair. They need the husband to protect them from a fullrelationship...as women who repeatedly get involved with married men need the wives'.[7]

Common themesEdit

A common love triangle is one in which the hero or heroine is torn between two suitors of radically contrasting personalities; one of a girl next door or nice guy type, and the other as a physically attractive but potentially hazardous person. Alternatively, the hero or heroine has a choice between a seemingly person's.

Around the mid-1950s in the U.S. several court rulings and state laws clearly recognized the many instances of no-fault reasons to end marriages. These included long-term separation, instances of incompatibility and loss of sanity. In practical terms, though, no-fault legislation was hard to use to actually provide a divorce for couples. It seemed that attorneys and judges were still driven by social mores that established the finality of marriage. Couples seeking divorce and their lawyers still had to fabricate their cases in a way that applied to established grounds most of the time. Ironically, as more people became married more than once in their lifetime and divorce was seen as less morally compromised, judges and attorneys had to sustain the fault-based divorce system to expedite the divorces easily. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TRUMP FOR PRESIDENCY!! 2017

Blackfoot vs. Cherokee vs, Alabama Coushatta??

Dangers of smoking and taking marijuana candy alternatives